Skip to main content
Builds the argument for a sales conversation on one topic. Not just the evidence: what the workaround costs them, how you are positioned against the competitor they named, and which objections to expect.

Arguments

Naming a company switches it to a micro-targeted playbook: what that customer said, plus peers in their segment.

What you get

Cost of inaction, not projected return

A forecast is something the buyer has to trust. “Someone spends Monday morning reconciling failed payments by hand” is their present, and verifiable. Built from the workarounds customers described.

Proof from their segment

A reference that looks like the prospect outweighs a more impressive one that does not. Naming a company matches proof points to their segment first.

Three, not ten

Three pain points, three objections, three proof points. Chosen by frequency and severity together.

Naming a company adds

  • What that customer said themselves.
  • Which competitor they mentioned.
  • The objections to expect from them.